InterviewGod · Coding interviews
Trivia questions and whiteboard theatre tell you who rehearsed, not who can build. InterviewGod's coding interview platform runs live, proctored coding rounds in a real editor, so your engineers watch how a candidate reasons through a problem and writes working code.
A shared coding environment, structured problems, integrity checks, and a scored record — the deep round you run with candidates who already cleared the upstream screen.
Banao — runs live coding rounds to hire engineers for its own ~300-person company.
A coding interview should show real ability under realistic conditions. The platform makes that easy to run and fair to score.
Candidate and interviewer code together in a real environment, so you watch reasoning and approach, not just a final answer.
Calibrated problems for the role and level, so interviews test what the job needs instead of whatever the interviewer recalls.
Integrity checks on remote coding rounds so a strong performance reflects the candidate, not an off-screen helper.
Each round is captured and scored, so a panel can review the actual code and reasoning rather than rely on memory.
Metrics shown dotted (··) are being finalised in our case-study metrics pack. The deployment is real; we will not publish a number before it is verified.
Banao (internal)
Banao runs live, proctored coding rounds to hire engineers for its own teams. The platform is built around what our interviewers actually need to judge whether someone can build, not just talk.
Cross-sell: technical screening automation
Pair the live platform with technical screening automation: the upstream screen filters who reaches a live coding round, so senior interviewer time goes only to candidates worth it.
Banao runs live, proctored coding rounds to hire for its own ~300-person engineering company. The platform is shaped by what our interviewers need to tell a builder from a memoriser — because we make that call constantly.
An interview tool built by people who do not hire engineers at scale shows. This one is built by a company that does, and depends on the result.
A coding interview measures coding, not everything. We will be clear about its limits:
We calibrate problems and interviewers before live rounds count.
We set up problem sets for your roles, calibrate your interviewers on one bar, and run sample rounds so scoring is consistent before real candidates. Yours to judge.
We tune problems, proctoring, and scoring to your stack and wire records into your ATS so they travel with the candidate.
Run live rounds for candidates who passed the upstream screen, with recorded, scored results your panel can review.
How is this different from technical screening automation?
Technical screening automation is the upstream, asynchronous filter that shortlists candidates before any human time. The coding interview platform is the live, proctored round your engineers run with the candidates who pass. One filters breadth automatically; the other goes deep with a human in the room.
Does it stop cheating in remote coding rounds?
It includes proctoring and integrity checks so a strong remote performance reflects the candidate rather than an off-screen helper. Combined with a live shared editor where interviewers watch reasoning in real time, it makes a passing result mean something.
Will interviews be consistent across our interviewers?
Yes. Calibrated problem sets and a shared scoring rubric mean candidates are tested and scored the same way regardless of who interviews them. We calibrate your interviewers on one bar in the Pilot Sprint before live rounds count.
Should we screen before the live round?
Yes — that is the recommended flow. Use technical screening automation to filter the funnel, then run live coding rounds only for candidates who already passed, so your senior interviewers' time goes where it is worth it.
Bring the engineering roles where interviews keep getting it wrong. In 30 minutes we'll scope live coding rounds that show real ability.
Book a demo
